Computer Supported Literacy: 
         
Reading 
     
Writing 
&
 
Referencing 

 
 
References
Hardware and Software
Literacy Links
Tutorials
Intervention
Vendor Sites
AAC Home
Acknowledgements
Computer Supported Literacy Project:
Case Study Report Outline


 Summary
Age:  14 years
Gender:   Male
School Placement History:  Regular education with resource assistance
Education Classification:  Orthopedic disability (athetoid cerebral palsy)
Type of Technology:  Rate enhancement software and alternate access

Intervention Referral

Nathan is entering high school next year and writing demands will increase, with his current typing rate (6 words per minute) it is difficult for him to keep up in the classroom.  Because Nathan is nonverbal a system that can be used for verbal communication is also necessary. 

Previous Intervention

Nathan has used a Macintosh laptop computer with Ke:nx On:Board and Co:Writer.  The expanded keyboard is accessed with the side on Nathan's thumb.  He uses a key guard that allows him to sweep across the keyboard.  Nathan can only type about 6 words per minute with this system.  He does not rely on the Co:Writer very often.  He states that it slows him down to scan the words and sometimes disrupts his train of thought.

Nathan is non-verbal and uses an Easy Talk from Sym Systems to communicate.  A LightWriter from Zygo was also considered, but Nathan had a difficult time accessing the smaller keys.  He relies primarily on spelling out words with the device and often does not even activate the keys. 

Assessment Summary

Literacy Needs: 
Summary of Technology Assessment: Alternate access was the primary focus of assessment.  The first access that was tried was the use of a Head Mouse from Origin Instruments.  The system was tried for three weeks one time per day.  Approximately 30 minutes to an hour was spent in each session depending upon circumstances.  After 3 weeks Nathan was able to get to a small target, but unable to hold on the target long enough for activation.  He had developed strategies to keep his head steady; such has holding his chin in cupped hands with elbows resting on the table.  Lowering the activation time was also tried, but with this adjustment there were a number of accidental activations.  Nathan decided that this method was not feasible and no more time should be spent on trying to train motor patterns.

The next access method that was tried was Morse Code input with two switches.  Nathan as able to use a fist on his right hand and rock between two switches to activate.  The codes were placed next to the screen.  Nathan quickly picked up on the most commonly used codes and could use the system well.  He did not however, feel that this was as fast as using the keyboard.  No timings were done with this input method because Nathan was still dependent upon scanning the codes for a lot of the text.  He thought that once he learned the codes his speed could be competitive with the use of an expanded keyboard, but it did not decrease the amount of physical excursion and added an initial cognitive load. 

Scanning input had been tried in the past and Nathan was familiar with how scanning worked.  When this was brought up, Nathan decided that he did not want to try it again. 

All of the previously mentioned access methods were evaluated in conjunction with Words+ EZKeys software.  The software allows Nathan word prediction and abbreviation expansion capabilities.  It will also allow him to use the computer as a communication system with same access method he uses to write.

Summary of Intervention

May 2000 - The results of the assessment warranted the use of a Windows based laptop with EZKeys and an Intellikeys keyboard with a keyguard.  Nathan used the system for two weeks and improved his typing rate to 8 words per minute.  After two weeks some adaptations to the keyboard were made and an adapted key guard with square instead of round holes was ordered.  Nathan stated that he though his rate would improve as he got more abbreviations programmed and got used to the system more. 

Outcome Updates

May 2000 - A new system has been ordered for Nathan.  It includes: Freedom 2000 (WIN laptop with EZKeys and DECTalk), Intellikeys, Key guard.

Nathan is also getting the system custom mounted to a power wheelchair so that it will be accessible at all times for all communication.

August 2000 -- Nathan is accessing a Freedom 2000 with Intellikeys at school for both written and verbal communication.  He has not yet obtained his power wheelchair, therefore, he does not have the device mounted.

May 2001 -- Funding for an entire system for Nathan has been submitted to his private insurance.  Included in this funding is a custom made lap tray that will allow Nathan access to his device at all times.  The tray will have a cut out area that will allow the computer to sit in the tray with no risk of falling off.  This will also let Nathan rest the keyboard over the computer without activating any keys.

Comments

Permission to share this information is on file at Munroe-Meyer Institute of Genetics and Rehabilitation, Scottish Rite Computer Supported Literacy Program.

Technology Links
Ke:nx OnBoard,  Don Johnston, Inc.
Head Mouse,  Origin Instruments
Co:Writer,  Don Johnston, Inc.
Freedom 2000,  Words+
Intellikeys,  Intellitools
Easy Talk,  Sym Systems
Lightwriter,  Zygo, Inc.

Bobby Approved Image
University of North Carolina
UNL Logo
Scottish Rite logo
Bobby Approved
for Web Accessibility
Scottish Rite
UNL
Dept. of Special Education &
Communication Disorders
UNMC 
Munroe/Meyer Institute for Genetics & Rehabilitation
AAC-
RERC
University of North Carolina